|
|
|
|
|
Is a
smooth transfer to digital radio possible?
In
the afternoon the EuroCOP Enlargement Conference made a digital switch,
changing the focus towards more hands-on features.
|
|
|
Making a decision on introducing digital radio and
actually going through with it are issues many European Police forces
are facing these days. Finland, UK and Spain are already quite ahead
in the process, with their national police forces operating digitally
already.
|

|
Norrie
Flowers, Chairman
of the Scottish Police Federation
|
|
Norrie Flowers, chairman of the Scottish Police
Federation, was the first one to share his countries experiences and
in particular the importance of managing health and safety risks.
“As
far as I know Scotland and the UK are the only ones performing a
health screening. Experts are divided if digital radio can be
dangerous and no conclusions have been made so far.
In this case we
are a winner and the results that come out of these studies will be
available for other countries.”
|
|
 |
Janne
Viljamaa, The
National
Police School
Finland
|
|
Janne Viljamaa from the National Police School of
Finland pointed out the advantages of a digital radio system.
“The most significant advantage is the ability to
multi-task, with one button the dispatcher can
alarm all necessary units; ambulances, rescue units, fire department,
etc.”
Another factor is the ability to
communicate with other countries, provided everyone is using the same
digital radio system.
“In Sweden they are for example building up Tetra
digital radio and in the future we will be able to communicate between
Finland and Sweden through it.
Before we had to use the mobile
phone”. Viljamaa also recommended to introduce digital radio in several
phases in order for the introduction to run smoothly and ended on a higher
note:
“Tetra does everything for you but it
doesn’t make coffee…”
|
|
|
|
Jeppe
Jepsen, TETRA Consortium
|
|
Jeppe Jepsen from the Tetra Consortium,
with members from Sweden, Finland, Norway, Belgium, the UK and other
countries, could shed some light on the market’s point of view.
“The bigger the market the better
competition - the more unanimous the easier it is to provide cheaper
products.”
With countries using different systems,
such as Tetra and Tetrapol, it becomes difficult to communicate across
borders, according to Jepsen.
Another example of non-functioning
communication mentioned by Jepsen was September 11th, explaining
why the rescue forces in Pentagon were able to deal with the situation in a
better way.
“In New York the various services could
not talk to each other. In Pentagon they had learned their lessons due to
an earlier plane crash accident.”
|
|
The EuroCOP special feature session was
rounded up by a panel discussion made up by police representatives from
Finland, Scotland, the Basque Country in Spain and the UK.
Norrie Flowers from SPF Scotland:
“As police officers we are a cynical lot anyway- so from a health
perspective it was important we got this in place and hopefully it will show
there are no health problems.”
Antti Jeronen from Finland:
“Tetra seemed like a good system, but in the EU we haven’t been able
to achieve a united front within digital radio- we cannot be successful in
our fight against crime if we don’t develop a common system.”
|
|
 |
Panel:
Norrie Flowers, Antti Jeronen,
Roger Randall
and Manuel Lopez
|
|
Roger Randall, BTFP, UK:
“I would just like to highlight some
problems: Tetra is not compatible with our underground system- the police
working there have to carry two systems. We also have a problem with
pirate radio systems battering into our systems which causes disturbance.
Other wise Tetra is God-sent, since we work in 43 different areas which
enables us to communicate with each other.”
Manuel Lopez, Er.N.E., Basque Country
“In my force we have ended the
preliminary phase this summer – but the national and civil guard use
another system which is based on Tetrapol. In the years to come there will
be two systems that aren’t inter operable. Therefore you won’t be able
to have contact with another policeman that is using the other system.
The Schengen article talking of
implementing international police cooperation will be difficult … If
policemen can intervene in another country but
can’t use their own system the cooperation is not going to work.
If for example policemen working for Frontex are using Tetrapol they
would have to use Tetra if they would want to contact the Finnish
colleagues.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|